linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: Convert from tasklet to BH workqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMdWSKzd1nt832+FHtwcMLO1rtgEC99Xz-wvNWGtXiyA8uK7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:09:08 -0700
From: Allen <allen.lkml@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>, Allen <allen.lkml@...il.com>, 
	Aubin Constans <aubin.constans@...rochip.com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, 
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, 
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, 
	Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>, Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>, 
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, 
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, 
	Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>, 
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>, 
	Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, 
	Bruce Chang <brucechang@....com.tw>, Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@...tech.com>, 
	Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu>, Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: Convert from tasklet to BH workqueue

>
> > If introducing the pointer is the only way forward and is an
> > acceptable solution,
> > I can send out a draft.
>
> My proposal is that I take over the SDHI part of your series. I know the
> code pretty well and I can test the solution right away. Your draft
> seems in the wrong layer (conceptually, technically it should work), but
> I need to play around a little. Is that okay with you?
>


  Sure, happy to help if needed.

Thanks.

-- 
       - Allen