[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bc864d6-11de-4762-b309-2e2a3bffaa24@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:02:03 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@...rochip.com>, Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@...nel.org>,
Ricardo Cañuelo <ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
Kamal Dasu <kamal.dasu@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@...esas.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Pierre-Yves MORDRET <pierre-yves.mordret@...s.st.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] dt-bindings: i2c: few fixes and cleanups
On 21/06/2024 01:05, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Cześć Krzysztof,
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 01:34:48PM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Few fixes for I2C controller schemas. The third patch (atmel,at91sam)
>> depends on first, so I suggest not splitting this into fixes branch but
>> take as is via next branch.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>> ---
>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (7):
>> dt-bindings: i2c: atmel,at91sam: correct path to i2c-controller schema
>> dt-bindings: i2c: google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel: correct path to i2c-controller schema
>
> merged to i2c/i2c-host-fixes
>
>> dt-bindings: i2c: atmel,at91sam: drop unneeded address/size-cells
>> dt-bindings: i2c: nvidia,tegra20: drop unneeded address/size-cells
>> dt-bindings: i2c: samsung,s3c2410: drop unneeded address/size-cells
>> dt-bindings: i2c: ti,omap4: reference i2c-controller.yaml schema
>> dt-bindings: i2c: adjust indentation in DTS example to coding style
>
> merged to i2c/i2c-host
So you broke the binding... Why openly ignoring my first sentence?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists