linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] docs: i2c: summary: document 'local' and 'remote' targets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <o5sbb2yqwzm3p2elxgoq6atgbw62e7jwzim6trjswbbozkptc2@4yzoaqanmrfn>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:03:27 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>, 
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] docs: i2c: summary: document 'local' and 'remote'
 targets


> > The refactoring only affects "master/slave" not "adapter/client". We are
> > 
> > aligned here, aren't we?
> 
> Yes, of course. And I'm not really asking for the totality of the
> "client"'s to be replaced, rather than, when replacing slave, to
> choose "target" over "client" whenever possible(*).

Okay, phew, seems we got it now :) I'll send out v4 today and probably
send it to Linus this week. I want this base work to be upstream ASAP,
so we can base further work on it.

Thanks for your input and cooperation, Easwar and Andi!


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)