linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/riscv: support nested iommu for getting iommu hardware information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANXhq0qts90x4L6gOhrAx0dMpX1UbPqEAK6QK9fshgso+Pxk3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:32:46 +0800
From: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com, 
	tjeznach@...osinc.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, 
	aou@...s.berkeley.edu, kevin.tian@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/riscv: support nested iommu for
 getting iommu hardware information

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:49 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 10:21:52PM +0800, Zong Li wrote:
> > This patch implements .hw_info operation and the related data
> > structures for passing the IOMMU hardware capabilities for iommufd.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c  | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
>
> >  /**
> >   * enum iommu_hw_info_type - IOMMU Hardware Info Types
> >   * @IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_NONE: Used by the drivers that do not report hardware
> >   *                           info
> >   * @IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_INTEL_VTD: Intel VT-d iommu info type
> > + * @IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_RISCV_IOMMU: RISC-V iommu info type
> >   */
>
> Is there a more formal name than "RISCV IOMMU" here? It seems like you
> will probably have a RISCV_IOMMU_V2 someday, is that naming OK?
>

RISC-V IOMMU currently doesn't have another name. If we are really
unfortunate enough to need to overhaul the entire structure, maybe we
can give it another proper name. But personally, RISCV_IOMMU_V2 is
fine with me.

I have also taken a look at comments on other patches, please allow me
a moment to digest that, I will reply to them later. Thanks

> Jason