[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee0d649b-9293-4bb7-9042-1a697cefb610@kwiboo.se>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:07:16 +0200
From: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
To: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner
<heiko@...ech.de>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>, Dragan Simic
<dsimic@...jaro.org>, Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>, Andy Yan
<andy.yan@...k-chips.com>, Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon@...labora.com>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>, Paul Kocialkowski
<paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>, Nicolas Dufresne
<nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>, Benjamin Gaignard
<benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>, Alex Bee <knaerzche@...il.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rkvdec2 Video Decoder on
rk3588(s)
Hi Datlev,
On 2024-06-20 16:19, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> Add the rkvdec2 Video Decoder to the RK3588s devicetree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
> index 6ac5ac8b48ab..9c44c99125b4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
> @@ -2596,6 +2596,16 @@ system_sram2: sram@...01000 {
> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0xff001000 0xef000>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> + vdec0_sram: rkvdec-sram@0 {
The node name should reflect the purpose of the node, not sure rkvdec is
a good purpose, cache-sram/codec-sram/sram-section could be a better
node name.
node name pattern: ^([a-z0-9]*-)?sram(-section)?@[a-f0-9]+$
> + reg = <0x0 0x78000>;
> + pool;
> + };
> +
> + vdec1_sram: rkvdec-sram@1 {
The binding for sram mention:
Following the generic-names recommended practice, node names should
reflect the purpose of the node. Unit address (@<address>) should be
appended to the name.
so the unit address should be @78000 and not @1. For name see above.
Regards,
Jonas
> + reg = <0x78000 0x77000>;
> + pool;
> + };
> };
>
> pinctrl: pinctrl {
[snip]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists