linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/15] parisc: use generic sys_fanotify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:52:08 +0200
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, 
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Thomas Bogendoerfer
 <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
 Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, Michael
 Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,  Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, "Naveen N . Rao"
 <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Brian Cain
 <bcain@...cinc.com>, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren
 <guoren@...nel.org>,  linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens
 <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,  linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Rich Felker
 <dalias@...c.org>,  linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin"
 <hpa@...or.com>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian
 Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,  linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 libc-alpha@...rceware.org,  musl@...ts.openwall.com, ltp@...ts.linux.it,
 Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] parisc: use generic sys_fanotify_mark
 implementation

Hi Helge and Arnd,

On Thu, 2024-06-20 at 23:21 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> The patch looks good at first sight.
> I'll pick it up in my parisc git tree and will do some testing the
> next few days and then push forward for 6.11 when it opens....

Isn't this supposed to go in as one series or can arch maintainers actually
pick the patches for their architecture and merge them individually?

If yes, I would prefer to do that for the SuperH patch as well as I usually
prefer merging SuperH patches in my own tree.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913