[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240621091908.juhoeb7zfo4zhsga@maili.marvell.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:49:08 +0530
From: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
To: Martin Hundebøll <martin@...nix.com>
CC: Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan <rcsekar@...sung.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde
<mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
"David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Markus
Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>,
<linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: m_can: don't enable transceiver when probing
On 2024-06-07 at 16:22:08, Martin Hundebøll (martin@...nix.com) wrote:
>
> - usleep_range(1, 5);
> + /* Then clear the it again. */
> + ret = m_can_cccr_update_bits(cdev, CCCR_NISO, 0);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(cdev->dev, "failed to revert the NON-ISO bit in CCCR\n");
> + return ret;
> }
>
> - /* Clear NISO */
> - cccr_reg &= ~(CCCR_NISO);
> - m_can_write(cdev, M_CAN_CCCR, cccr_reg);
> + ret = m_can_config_disable(cdev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
if ret != 0, then the function returns "true", right ?
as indicated by the below comment. But as i understand,
this is an error case and should return "false"
> - /* return false if time out (-ETIMEDOUT), else return true */
> - return !niso_timeout;
> + return niso == 0;
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists