| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:55:13 +0800
From: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@...wei.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
CC: <chandan.babu@...cle.com>, <dchinner@...hat.com>,
<linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yangerkun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Avoid races with cnt_btree lastrec updates
在 2024/6/21 9:40, Zizhi Wo 写道:
>
>
> 在 2024/6/21 4:35, Darrick J. Wong 写道:
>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 09:05:29AM +0800, Zizhi Wo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 在 2024/6/19 8:22, Darrick J. Wong 写道:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 09:32:08PM +0800, Zizhi Wo wrote:
>>>>> A concurrent file creation and little writing could unexpectedly
>>>>> return
>>>>> -ENOSPC error since there is a race window that the allocator could
>>>>> get
>>>>> the wrong agf->agf_longest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Write file process steps:
>>>>> 1) Find the entry that best meets the conditions, then calculate
>>>>> the start
>>>>> address and length of the remaining part of the entry after
>>>>> allocation.
>>>>> 2) Delete this entry and update the agf->agf_longest.
>>>>> 3) Insert the remaining unused parts of this entry based on the
>>>>> calculations in 1), and update the agf->agf_longest again if
>>>>> necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> Create file process steps:
>>>>> 1) Check whether there are free inodes in the inode chunk.
>>>>> 2) If there is no free inode, check whether there has space for
>>>>> creating
>>>>> inode chunks, perform the no-lock judgment first.
>>>>> 3) If the judgment succeeds, the judgment is performed again with
>>>>> agf lock
>>>>> held. Otherwire, an error is returned directly.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the write process is in step 2) but not go to 3) yet, the create
>>>>> file
>>>>> process goes to 2) at this time, it will be mistaken for no space,
>>>>> resulting in the file system still has space but the file creation
>>>>> fails.
>>>>>
>>>>> We have sent two different commits to the community in order to fix
>>>>> this
>>>>> problem[1][2]. Unfortunately, both solutions have flaws. In [2], I
>>>>> discussed with Dave and Darrick, realized that a better solution to
>>>>> this
>>>>> problem requires the "last cnt record tracking" to be ripped out of
>>>>> the
>>>>> generic btree code. And surprisingly, Dave directly provided his
>>>>> fix code.
>>>>> This patch includes appropriate modifications based on his tmp-code to
>>>>> address this issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> The entire fix can be roughly divided into two parts:
>>>>> 1) Delete the code related to lastrec-update in the generic btree
>>>>> code.
>>>>> 2) Place the process of updating longest freespace with cntbt
>>>>> separately
>>>>> to the end of the cntbt modifications. And only these two
>>>>> scenarios
>>>>> need to be considered:
>>>>> 2.1) In the deletion scenario, directly update the longest to the
>>>>> rightmost record of the cntbt.
>>>>> 2.2) In the insertion scenario, determine whether the cntbt
>>>>> has the
>>>>> record that larger than the previous longest.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240419061848.1032366-2-yebin10@huawei.com
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240604071121.3981686-1-wozizhi@huawei.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@...wei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c | 116
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c | 64 ------------------
>>>>> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 51 --------------
>>>>> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h | 16 ++---
>>>>> 4 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
>>>>> index 6c55a6e88eba..74e40f75a278 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
>>>>> @@ -465,6 +465,99 @@ xfs_alloc_fix_len(
>>>>> args->len = rlen;
>>>>> }
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * Determine if the cursor points to the block that contains the
>>>>> right-most
>>>>> + * block of records in the by-count btree. This block contains the
>>>>> largest
>>>>> + * contiguous free extent in the AG, so if we modify ia record in
>>>>> this block we
>>>>
>>>> a record
>>>>
>>>>> + * need to call xfs_alloc_fixup_longest() once the modifications
>>>>> are done to
>>>>> + * ensure the agf->agf_longest field is kept up to date with the
>>>>> longest free
>>>>> + * extent tracked by the by-count btree.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static bool
>>>>> +xfs_alloc_cursor_at_lastrec(
>>>>> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cnt_cur)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct xfs_btree_block *block;
>>>>> + union xfs_btree_ptr ptr;
>>>>> + struct xfs_buf *bp;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + block = xfs_btree_get_block(cnt_cur, 0, &bp);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + xfs_btree_get_sibling(cnt_cur, block, &ptr, XFS_BB_RIGHTSIB);
>>>>> + if (!xfs_btree_ptr_is_null(cnt_cur, &ptr))
>>>>> + return false;
>>>>> + return true;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * Update the longest contiguous free extent in the AG from the
>>>>> by-count cursor
>>>>> + * that is passed to us. This should be done at the end of any
>>>>> allocation or
>>>>> + * freeing operation that touches the longest extent in the btree.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Needing to update the longest extent can be determined by calling
>>>>> + * xfs_alloc_cursor_at_lastrec() after the cursor is positioned
>>>>> for record
>>>>> + * modification but before the modification begins.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static int
>>>>> +xfs_alloc_fixup_longest(
>>>>> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cnt_cur,
>>>>> + int reason)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct xfs_perag *pag = cnt_cur->bc_ag.pag;
>>>>> + struct xfs_agf *agf;
>>>>> + struct xfs_buf *bp;
>>>>> + struct xfs_btree_block *block;
>>>>> + int error;
>>>>> + int i;
>>>>> + int numrecs;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Lookup last rec and update AGF.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * In case of LASTREC_DELREC, after called
>>>>> xfs_alloc_lookup_ge(), the
>>>>> + * ptr is in the rightmost edge, and we need to update the
>>>>> last record
>>>>> + * of this block as the longest free extent.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * In case of LASTREC_INSREC, because only one new record is
>>>>> inserted
>>>>> + * each time, only need to check whether the cntbt has a
>>>>> record that
>>>>> + * larger than the previous longest. Note that we can't update
>>>>> the
>>>>> + * longest with xfs_alloc_get_rec() as the xfs_verify_agbno()
>>>>> may not
>>>>> + * pass because pag->block_count is updated on the outside.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + error = xfs_alloc_lookup_ge(cnt_cur, 0, pag->pagf_longest + 1,
>>>>> &i);
>>>>> + if (error)
>>>>> + return error;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (i == 1 || reason == LASTREC_DELREC) {
>>>>> + if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(pag->pag_mount,
>>>>> + i == 1 && reason == LASTREC_DELREC)) {
>>>>> + xfs_btree_mark_sick(cnt_cur);
>>>>> + return -EFSCORRUPTED;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + block = xfs_btree_get_block(cnt_cur, 0, &bp);
>>>>> + numrecs = xfs_btree_get_numrecs(block);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (numrecs) {
>>>>> + xfs_alloc_rec_t *rrp;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + rrp = XFS_ALLOC_REC_ADDR(cnt_cur->bc_mp, block,
>>>>> + numrecs);
>>>>> + pag->pagf_longest = be32_to_cpu(rrp->ar_blockcount);
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + /* empty tree */
>>>>> + pag->pagf_longest = 0;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> Hum. Would it work if we did:
>>>>
>>>> xfs_extlen_t len;
>>>>
>>>> xfs_alloc_lookup_le(cnt_cur, 0, mp->m_sb.sb_agsize, &i);
>>>>
>>>> if (i)
>>>> xfs_alloc_get_rec(cnt_cur, ..., &len, &i);
>>>> if (!i)
>>>> len = 0;
>>>>
>>>> pag->pagf_longest = len;
>>>>
>>>> This performs a LE lookup on the longest possible free extent (aka the
>>>> AG size). If we get pointed at a record, that's the longest free
>>>> extent
>>>> and we can set pag->pagf_longest to that. If we get no record, then
>>>> there's zero space and we can zero it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I checked it out, and it doesn't seem to work that way, for two reasons:
>>> 1) In the insertion scenario, if the longest extent is continuous with
>>> the extent to be inserted, the system deletes the longest extent first,
>>> and then inserts a more longer extent. So in the last update, we should
>>> not look at le, but ge.
>>> 2) For the deletion scenario, because the start block is 0, the extent
>>> value found is not the next longest extent value, but probably a very
>>> small extent value (for example, its start block is very small), which
>>> will also cause us to update incorrectly.
>>>
>>> So in summary, I think it is appropriate to use ge here.
>>
>> Ah, right, you're correct.
>>
>> LE could work if you were willing to do:
>>
>> xfs_alloc_lookup_le(cnt_cur, mp->m_sb.sb_agsize,
>> mp->m_sb.sb_agsize, &i);
>>
>> But you might as well stick with the GE lookup.
>>
>>> On the other
>>> hand, xfs_alloc_get_rec() introduces problems. As I wrote in the
>>> comment, an internal call to xfs_verify_agbno() may fail because the
>>> longest extent added, it could be greater than pag->block_count as
>>> pag->block_count is later than the longest update.
>>
>> Oh, because xfs_ag_extend_space (aka growfs) calls xfs_free_extent
>> before updating pag->block_count. But still, please don't use
>> XFS_ALLOC_REC_ADDR when you already have a btree cursor handy.
>>
>> union xfs_btree_rec *rec;
>>
>> xfs_alloc_lookup_ge(cnt_cur, 0, mp->m_sb.sb_agsize, &i);
>> if (i)
>> xfs_btree_get_rec(cur, &rec, &i);
>> if (i) {
>> struct xfs_alloc_rec_incore irec;
>>
>> /*
>> * pagf->block_count updates lag cntbt updates, so
>> * open-code the btree record access
>> */
>> xfs_alloc_btrec_to_irec(rec, &irec);
>> pagf->pagf_longest = irec.ar_blockcount;
>> } else {
>> /* empty tree */
>> pagf->pagf_longest = 0;
>> }
>>
>> --D
>>
>
> Thank you for pointing that out. Using XFS_ALLOC_REC_ADDR when already
> holding a cursor indeed reduces efficiency. However, there are still two
> points that I don't understand and worth discussing.
> 1) Is the "mp->m_sb.sb_agsize" means "pag->pagf_longest"? Because I can
> not find the "sb_agsize" definition in xfs_mount structure.
> 2) If "mp->m_sb.sb_agsize" means the longest, then in a deletion
> scenario, if the record being deleted is not the longest, -i- in
> xfs_alloc_lookup_ge() will be 0. The above code will incorrectly update
> the longest to 0 instead of keeping it as original. Therefore, in this
> scenario, would it be better to move the cursor one record to the left?
> But if we move the cursor to the left, we still need to retrieve the
> record. So, compared to directly calling XFS_ALLOC_REC_ADDR, I do not
> know which approach is better...
>
> These are my two points of confusion. I hope to get your answers. Thank
> you very much!
>
Sorry, let me reframe my point...
1) If "mp->m_sb.sb_agsize" means "pag->pagf_longest", then the deletion
scenario has no problem but the insertion has. Because at this time, the
record we found based on the previous longest may no longer be the
current largest.
2) If "mp->m_sb.sb_agsize" means "pag->pagf_longest + 1", then the
insertion scenarios has no problem but the deletion has. The reason is
what I described in the second point above: it may not find a record
larger than longest + 1, and incorrectly update longest to 0.
So, to combine these two situations, I used the XFS_ALLOC_REC_ADDR
even when a cursor was available...
> Thanks,
> Zizhi Wo
>
>>>> Then I think you don't need the @reason argument either.
>>>
>>> Mm-hm, the reasons for this will be removed from the comment and stated
>>> next time in the commit message.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Zizhi Wo
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --D
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> + bp = cnt_cur->bc_ag.agbp;
>>>>> + agf = bp->b_addr;
>>>>> + agf->agf_longest = cpu_to_be32(pag->pagf_longest);
>>>>> + xfs_alloc_log_agf(cnt_cur->bc_tp, bp, XFS_AGF_LONGEST);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Update the two btrees, logically removing from freespace the
>>>>> extent
>>>>> * starting at rbno, rlen blocks. The extent is contained
>>>>> within the
>>>>> @@ -489,6 +582,7 @@ xfs_alloc_fixup_trees(
>>>>> xfs_extlen_t nflen1=0; /* first new free length */
>>>>> xfs_extlen_t nflen2=0; /* second new free length */
>>>>> struct xfs_mount *mp;
>>>>> + bool fixup_longest = false;
>>>>> mp = cnt_cur->bc_mp;
>>>>> @@ -577,6 +671,10 @@ xfs_alloc_fixup_trees(
>>>>> nfbno2 = rbno + rlen;
>>>>> nflen2 = (fbno + flen) - nfbno2;
>>>>> }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (xfs_alloc_cursor_at_lastrec(cnt_cur))
>>>>> + fixup_longest = true;
>>>>> +
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Delete the entry from the by-size btree.
>>>>> */
>>>>> @@ -654,6 +752,10 @@ xfs_alloc_fixup_trees(
>>>>> return -EFSCORRUPTED;
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (fixup_longest)
>>>>> + return xfs_alloc_fixup_longest(cnt_cur, LASTREC_DELREC);
>>>>> +
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -1956,6 +2058,7 @@ xfs_free_ag_extent(
>>>>> int i;
>>>>> int error;
>>>>> struct xfs_perag *pag = agbp->b_pag;
>>>>> + bool fixup_longest = false;
>>>>> bno_cur = cnt_cur = NULL;
>>>>> mp = tp->t_mountp;
>>>>> @@ -2219,8 +2322,13 @@ xfs_free_ag_extent(
>>>>> }
>>>>> xfs_btree_del_cursor(bno_cur, XFS_BTREE_NOERROR);
>>>>> bno_cur = NULL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * In all cases we need to insert the new freespace in the
>>>>> by-size tree.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * If this new freespace is being inserted in the block that
>>>>> contains
>>>>> + * the largest free space in the btree, make sure we also fix
>>>>> up the
>>>>> + * agf->agf-longest tracker field.
>>>>> */
>>>>> if ((error = xfs_alloc_lookup_eq(cnt_cur, nbno, nlen, &i)))
>>>>> goto error0;
>>>>> @@ -2229,6 +2337,8 @@ xfs_free_ag_extent(
>>>>> error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
>>>>> goto error0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> + if (xfs_alloc_cursor_at_lastrec(cnt_cur))
>>>>> + fixup_longest = true;
>>>>> if ((error = xfs_btree_insert(cnt_cur, &i)))
>>>>> goto error0;
>>>>> if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, i != 1)) {
>>>>> @@ -2236,6 +2346,12 @@ xfs_free_ag_extent(
>>>>> error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
>>>>> goto error0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> + if (fixup_longest) {
>>>>> + error = xfs_alloc_fixup_longest(cnt_cur, LASTREC_INSREC);
>>>>> + if (error)
>>>>> + goto error0;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> xfs_btree_del_cursor(cnt_cur, XFS_BTREE_NOERROR);
>>>>> cnt_cur = NULL;
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
>>>>> b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
>>>>> index 6ef5ddd89600..585e98e87ef9 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
>>>>> @@ -115,67 +115,6 @@ xfs_allocbt_free_block(
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> -/*
>>>>> - * Update the longest extent in the AGF
>>>>> - */
>>>>> -STATIC void
>>>>> -xfs_allocbt_update_lastrec(
>>>>> - struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
>>>>> - const struct xfs_btree_block *block,
>>>>> - const union xfs_btree_rec *rec,
>>>>> - int ptr,
>>>>> - int reason)
>>>>> -{
>>>>> - struct xfs_agf *agf = cur->bc_ag.agbp->b_addr;
>>>>> - struct xfs_perag *pag;
>>>>> - __be32 len;
>>>>> - int numrecs;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - ASSERT(!xfs_btree_is_bno(cur->bc_ops));
>>>>> -
>>>>> - switch (reason) {
>>>>> - case LASTREC_UPDATE:
>>>>> - /*
>>>>> - * If this is the last leaf block and it's the last record,
>>>>> - * then update the size of the longest extent in the AG.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> - if (ptr != xfs_btree_get_numrecs(block))
>>>>> - return;
>>>>> - len = rec->alloc.ar_blockcount;
>>>>> - break;
>>>>> - case LASTREC_INSREC:
>>>>> - if (be32_to_cpu(rec->alloc.ar_blockcount) <=
>>>>> - be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_longest))
>>>>> - return;
>>>>> - len = rec->alloc.ar_blockcount;
>>>>> - break;
>>>>> - case LASTREC_DELREC:
>>>>> - numrecs = xfs_btree_get_numrecs(block);
>>>>> - if (ptr <= numrecs)
>>>>> - return;
>>>>> - ASSERT(ptr == numrecs + 1);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - if (numrecs) {
>>>>> - xfs_alloc_rec_t *rrp;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - rrp = XFS_ALLOC_REC_ADDR(cur->bc_mp, block, numrecs);
>>>>> - len = rrp->ar_blockcount;
>>>>> - } else {
>>>>> - len = 0;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> - break;
>>>>> - default:
>>>>> - ASSERT(0);
>>>>> - return;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> - agf->agf_longest = len;
>>>>> - pag = cur->bc_ag.agbp->b_pag;
>>>>> - pag->pagf_longest = be32_to_cpu(len);
>>>>> - xfs_alloc_log_agf(cur->bc_tp, cur->bc_ag.agbp, XFS_AGF_LONGEST);
>>>>> -}
>>>>> -
>>>>> STATIC int
>>>>> xfs_allocbt_get_minrecs(
>>>>> struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
>>>>> @@ -493,7 +432,6 @@ const struct xfs_btree_ops xfs_bnobt_ops = {
>>>>> .set_root = xfs_allocbt_set_root,
>>>>> .alloc_block = xfs_allocbt_alloc_block,
>>>>> .free_block = xfs_allocbt_free_block,
>>>>> - .update_lastrec = xfs_allocbt_update_lastrec,
>>>>> .get_minrecs = xfs_allocbt_get_minrecs,
>>>>> .get_maxrecs = xfs_allocbt_get_maxrecs,
>>>>> .init_key_from_rec = xfs_allocbt_init_key_from_rec,
>>>>> @@ -511,7 +449,6 @@ const struct xfs_btree_ops xfs_bnobt_ops = {
>>>>> const struct xfs_btree_ops xfs_cntbt_ops = {
>>>>> .name = "cnt",
>>>>> .type = XFS_BTREE_TYPE_AG,
>>>>> - .geom_flags = XFS_BTGEO_LASTREC_UPDATE,
>>>>> .rec_len = sizeof(xfs_alloc_rec_t),
>>>>> .key_len = sizeof(xfs_alloc_key_t),
>>>>> @@ -525,7 +462,6 @@ const struct xfs_btree_ops xfs_cntbt_ops = {
>>>>> .set_root = xfs_allocbt_set_root,
>>>>> .alloc_block = xfs_allocbt_alloc_block,
>>>>> .free_block = xfs_allocbt_free_block,
>>>>> - .update_lastrec = xfs_allocbt_update_lastrec,
>>>>> .get_minrecs = xfs_allocbt_get_minrecs,
>>>>> .get_maxrecs = xfs_allocbt_get_maxrecs,
>>>>> .init_key_from_rec = xfs_allocbt_init_key_from_rec,
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
>>>>> index d29547572a68..a5c4af148853 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
>>>>> @@ -1331,30 +1331,6 @@ xfs_btree_init_block_cur(
>>>>> xfs_btree_owner(cur));
>>>>> }
>>>>> -/*
>>>>> - * Return true if ptr is the last record in the btree and
>>>>> - * we need to track updates to this record. The decision
>>>>> - * will be further refined in the update_lastrec method.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> -STATIC int
>>>>> -xfs_btree_is_lastrec(
>>>>> - struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
>>>>> - struct xfs_btree_block *block,
>>>>> - int level)
>>>>> -{
>>>>> - union xfs_btree_ptr ptr;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - if (level > 0)
>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>> - if (!(cur->bc_ops->geom_flags & XFS_BTGEO_LASTREC_UPDATE))
>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - xfs_btree_get_sibling(cur, block, &ptr, XFS_BB_RIGHTSIB);
>>>>> - if (!xfs_btree_ptr_is_null(cur, &ptr))
>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>> - return 1;
>>>>> -}
>>>>> -
>>>>> STATIC void
>>>>> xfs_btree_buf_to_ptr(
>>>>> struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
>>>>> @@ -2420,15 +2396,6 @@ xfs_btree_update(
>>>>> xfs_btree_copy_recs(cur, rp, rec, 1);
>>>>> xfs_btree_log_recs(cur, bp, ptr, ptr);
>>>>> - /*
>>>>> - * If we are tracking the last record in the tree and
>>>>> - * we are at the far right edge of the tree, update it.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> - if (xfs_btree_is_lastrec(cur, block, 0)) {
>>>>> - cur->bc_ops->update_lastrec(cur, block, rec,
>>>>> - ptr, LASTREC_UPDATE);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> /* Pass new key value up to our parent. */
>>>>> if (xfs_btree_needs_key_update(cur, ptr)) {
>>>>> error = xfs_btree_update_keys(cur, 0);
>>>>> @@ -3617,15 +3584,6 @@ xfs_btree_insrec(
>>>>> goto error0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> - /*
>>>>> - * If we are tracking the last record in the tree and
>>>>> - * we are at the far right edge of the tree, update it.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> - if (xfs_btree_is_lastrec(cur, block, level)) {
>>>>> - cur->bc_ops->update_lastrec(cur, block, rec,
>>>>> - ptr, LASTREC_INSREC);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Return the new block number, if any.
>>>>> * If there is one, give back a record value and a cursor too.
>>>>> @@ -3983,15 +3941,6 @@ xfs_btree_delrec(
>>>>> xfs_btree_set_numrecs(block, --numrecs);
>>>>> xfs_btree_log_block(cur, bp, XFS_BB_NUMRECS);
>>>>> - /*
>>>>> - * If we are tracking the last record in the tree and
>>>>> - * we are at the far right edge of the tree, update it.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> - if (xfs_btree_is_lastrec(cur, block, level)) {
>>>>> - cur->bc_ops->update_lastrec(cur, block, NULL,
>>>>> - ptr, LASTREC_DELREC);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * We're at the root level. First, shrink the root block
>>>>> in-memory.
>>>>> * Try to get rid of the next level down. If we can't then
>>>>> there's
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h
>>>>> index f93374278aa1..670470874630 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h
>>>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h
>>>>> @@ -154,12 +154,6 @@ struct xfs_btree_ops {
>>>>> int *stat);
>>>>> int (*free_block)(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, struct
>>>>> xfs_buf *bp);
>>>>> - /* update last record information */
>>>>> - void (*update_lastrec)(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
>>>>> - const struct xfs_btree_block *block,
>>>>> - const union xfs_btree_rec *rec,
>>>>> - int ptr, int reason);
>>>>> -
>>>>> /* records in block/level */
>>>>> int (*get_minrecs)(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, int level);
>>>>> int (*get_maxrecs)(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, int level);
>>>>> @@ -222,15 +216,13 @@ struct xfs_btree_ops {
>>>>> };
>>>>> /* btree geometry flags */
>>>>> -#define XFS_BTGEO_LASTREC_UPDATE (1U << 0) /* track last rec
>>>>> externally */
>>>>> -#define XFS_BTGEO_OVERLAPPING (1U << 1) /* overlapping
>>>>> intervals */
>>>>> +#define XFS_BTGEO_OVERLAPPING (1U << 0) /* overlapping
>>>>> intervals */
>>>>> /*
>>>>> - * Reasons for the update_lastrec method to be called.
>>>>> + * Reasons for the xfs_alloc_fixup_longest() to be called.
>>>>> */
>>>>> -#define LASTREC_UPDATE 0
>>>>> -#define LASTREC_INSREC 1
>>>>> -#define LASTREC_DELREC 2
>>>>> +#define LASTREC_INSREC 0
>>>>> +#define LASTREC_DELREC 1
>>>>> union xfs_btree_irec {
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.39.2
>>>>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists