linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8650: drop TCXO from table when using rcg2_shared

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 13:01:43 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8650: drop TCXO from table when
 using rcg2_shared_ops

On 21.06.2024 4:01 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Since those clocks are using rcg2_shared_ops to park on TCXO
> instead of disable, no need to have TCXO in the frequency table.
> 
> Fixes: 9e939f008338 ("clk: qcom: add the SM8650 Display Clock Controller driver")
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
> ---

I don't think that's correct.. some hardware can still run with the
core clock @ 19.2 / 38.4 MHz

Konrad