[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c14c943ee0a5619bdc272adbdd76a61809b73b6.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 19:04:52 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Xuefeng
Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>, guoren <guoren@...nel.org>, WANG Xuerui
<kernel@...0n.name>, Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Define __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT in unistd.h
On Sat, 2024-06-22 at 15:45 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Ruoyao,
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 2:45 PM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 08:35 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2024, at 15:12, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2024-06-15 at 20:12 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > [Firefox]:
> > > > > https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/security/sandbox/linu
> > > > > x/SandboxFilter.cpp#364
> > > >
> > > > Just spent some brain cycles to make a quick hack adding a new statx
> > > > flag. Patch attached.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the prototype. I agree that this is not a good API
> >
> > What is particular bad with it? Maybe we can improve before annoying
> > VFS guys :).
> >
> > > but that it would address the issue and I am fine with merging
> > > something like this if you can convince the VFS maintainers.
> >
> > Before that I'd like someone to purpose a better name. I really dislike
> > "AT_FORCE_EMPTY_PATH" but I cannot come up with something better.
> Any updates? Have you submitted this patch? I hope we can end up at 6.11. :)
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20240622105621.7922-1-xry111@xry111.site/
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
Powered by blists - more mailing lists