[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb23a7b0-dce6-4359-995a-2c12cf30cfff@web.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:24:25 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Neal Liu <neal_liu@...eedtech.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast
udc
> We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host
> may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array.
* Can an imperative wording be more desirable for such a change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc4#n94
* Will any tags (like “Fixes”) become relevant here?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists