linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: r8a66597-udc: validate endpoint index for r8a66597 udc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4c28e897-0f44-4927-a4e7-762fce28ae63@web.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:30:16 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: r8a66597-udc: validate endpoint index for
 r8a66597 udc

> We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host
> may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array.

* Can an imperative wording be more desirable for such a change description?
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc4#n94

* Will any tags (like “Fixes”) become relevant here?

Regards,
Markus