lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdnoOyKYbaNtr_UKn9NMSzXR1Syn9W7u0qtLgGuwYX6-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:23:18 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	iommu@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, 
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, 
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, 
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] OF: Simplify of_iommu_configure()

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 8:47 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
>
> We no longer have a notion of partially-initialised fwspecs existing,
> and we also no longer need to use an iommu_ops pointer to return status
> to of_dma_configure(). Clean up the remains of those, which lends itself
> to clarifying the logic around the dma_range_map allocation as well.

...

> +       if (!err && dev->bus)
> +               err = iommu_probe_device(dev);
>
> +       if (err && err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +               dev_dbg(dev, "Adding to IOMMU failed: %d\n", err);

Hmm... I'm wondering if dev_err_probe() can be used here.

>         return err;

...

> +       dev_dbg(dev, "device is%sbehind an iommu\n",
> +               !ret ? " " : " not ");

Why not a positive test?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ