[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZnY9IEt571DwqtTJ@mozart.vkv.me>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 19:55:28 -0700
From: Calvin Owens <calvin@...nvd.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] kbuild: buildtar: Add explicit 32-bit arm
support
On Friday 06/21 at 07:55 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Calvin,
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 07:25:59PM -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > Implement buildtar for 32-bit arm, so the zImage (or xipimage) appears
> > at boot/vmlinuz-$foo, rather than at boot/vmlinux-kbuild-$foo, matching
> > the structure of the tar-pkg on arm64 and other architectures.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZhmKzqxHXaSZmXee@mozart.vkv.me/
> > Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@...nvd.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > scripts/package/buildtar | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/package/buildtar b/scripts/package/buildtar
> > index eb67787f8673..23d7ff675396 100755
> > --- a/scripts/package/buildtar
> > +++ b/scripts/package/buildtar
> > @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ case "${ARCH}" in
> > cp -v -- "${KBUILD_IMAGE}" "${tmpdir}/boot/vmlinux-${KERNELRELEASE}";;
> > esac
> > ;;
> > + arm)
> > + [ -f "${KBUILD_IMAGE}" ] && cp -v -- "${KBUILD_IMAGE}" "${tmpdir}/boot/vmlinuz-${KERNELRELEASE}"
> > + ;;
> > *)
> > cp -v -- "${KBUILD_IMAGE}" "${tmpdir}/boot/vmlinuz-${KERNELRELEASE}"
> > ;;
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
>
> Is this change necessary after commit 2b1ab1405068 ("kbuild: buildtar:
> remove warning for the default case")? Without the '[ -f ... ] &&' part
> of the expression, which was removed for other cases in
> commit c3f7bed8fa14 ("kbuild: buildtar: add comments about inconsistent
> package generation"), it appears to be the same thing.
Oops. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks,
Calvin
> Cheers,
> Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists