linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvme-pci: limit queue count to housekeeping cpus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240622051420.GC11303@lst.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 07:14:20 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbecker@...e.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Sridhar Balaraman <sbalaraman@...allelwireless.com>,
	"brookxu.cn" <brookxu.cn@...il.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvme-pci: limit queue count to housekeeping cpus

> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> index 9638b25fd521..43c039900ef6 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> @@ -11,10 +11,23 @@
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>  #include <linux/group_cpus.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
>  
>  #include "blk.h"
>  #include "blk-mq.h"
>  
> +unsigned int blk_mq_num_possible_queues(void)
> +{
> +	const struct cpumask *io_queue_mask;
> +
> +	io_queue_mask = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_IO_QUEUE);
> +	if (!cpumask_empty(io_queue_mask))
> +		return cpumask_weight(io_queue_mask);
> +
> +	return num_possible_cpus();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_num_possible_queues);

This should be split into a separate patch.  And it could really use
a kerneldoc comment.

> -	return num_possible_cpus() + dev->nr_write_queues + dev->nr_poll_queues;
> +	return blk_mq_num_possible_queues() + dev->nr_write_queues + dev->nr_poll_queues;

Please avoid the overly long line here.

Otherwise this looks good to me.