[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7882f94-e2cb-4023-a53e-87ebc8fa3460@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 11:33:28 +0200
From: Alex Bee <knaerzche@...il.com>
To: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>, Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] media: rockchip: Introduce the rkvdec2 driver
Hi Detlev,
Am 20.06.24 um 16:19 schrieb Detlev Casanova:
> This driver supports the second generation of the Rockchip Video
> decoder, also known as vdpu34x.
> It is currently only used on the RK3588(s) SoC.
>
> There are 2 decoders on the RK3588 SoC that can work in pair to decode
> 8K video at 30 FPS but currently, only using one core at a time is
> supported.
>
> Scheduling requests between the two cores will be implemented later.
>
> The core supports H264, HEVC, VP9 and AVS2 decoding but this driver
> currently only supports H264.
>
> The driver is based on rkvdec and they may share some code in the
> future.
> The decision to make a different driver is mainly because rkvdec2 has
> more features and can work with multiple cores.
>
> The registers are mapped in a struct in RAM using bitfields. It is IO
> copied to the HW when all values are configured.
> The decision to use such a struct instead of writing buffers one by one
> is based on the following reasons:
> - Rockchip cores are known to misbehave when registers are not written
> in address order,
> - Those cores also need the software to write all registers, even if
> they are written their default values or are not related to the task
> (this core will not start decoding some H264 frames if some VP9
> registers are not written to 0)
> - In the future, to support multiple cores, the scheduler could be
> optimized by storing the precomputed registers values and copy them
> to the HW as soos as a core becomes available.
>
> This makes the code more readable and may bring performance improvements
> in future features.
>
> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/staging/media/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/Kconfig | 15 +
> drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/Makefile | 3 +
> drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/TODO | 9 +
> drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/rkvdec2-h264.c | 739 +++++++++++
> drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/rkvdec2-regs.h | 345 +++++
> drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/rkvdec2.c | 1253 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/rkvdec2.h | 130 ++
> 9 files changed, 2496 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/TODO
> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/rkvdec2-h264.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/rkvdec2-regs.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/rkvdec2.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/rkvdec2/rkvdec2.h
...
> +static inline void rkvdec2_memcpy_toio(void __iomem *dst, void *src, size_t len)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> + __iowrite32_copy(dst, src, len);
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM)
I guess that can get an "#else" since memcpy_toio exists for all archs.
> + memcpy_toio(dst, src, len);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
...
> + /* Set timeout threshold */
> + if (pixels < RKVDEC2_1080P_PIXELS)
> + regs->common.timeout_threshold = RKVDEC2_TIMEOUT_1080p;
> + else if (pixels < RKVDEC2_4K_PIXELS)
> + regs->common.timeout_threshold = RKVDEC2_TIMEOUT_4K;
> + else if (pixels < RKVDEC2_8K_PIXELS)
> + regs->common.timeout_threshold = RKVDEC2_TIMEOUT_8K;
> +
Did you test if it works with anything > 8K? If so, you propably want to
make the check above
+ else
+ regs->common.timeout_threshold = RKVDEC2_TIMEOUT_8K;
Otherwise the timeout may not be set/contain invalid values from any former stream.
...
> +
> +static const struct rkvdec2_coded_fmt_desc rkvdec2_coded_fmts[] = {
> + {
> + .fourcc = V4L2_PIX_FMT_H264_SLICE,
> + .frmsize = {
> + .min_width = 16,
> + .max_width = 65520,
> + .step_width = 16,
> + .min_height = 16,
> + .max_height = 65520,
> + .step_height = 16,
> + },
> + .ctrls = &rkvdec2_h264_ctrls,
> + .ops = &rkvdec2_h264_fmt_ops,
> + .num_decoded_fmts = ARRAY_SIZE(rkvdec2_h264_decoded_fmts),
> + .decoded_fmts = rkvdec2_h264_decoded_fmts,
> + .subsystem_flags = VB2_V4L2_FL_SUPPORTS_M2M_HOLD_CAPTURE_BUF,
> + },
> +};
> +
Note, that this is also given to userspace (VIDIOC_ENUM_FRAMESIZES) and
this is already incorrect in the old rkvdec driver (and hantro): From
userspace perspective we do not have a restriction in
step_width/step_width, as we are aligning any given width/height to HW
requirements in the driver - what we should give to userspace is
fsize->type = V4L2_FRMSIZE_TYPE_CONTINUOUS; fsize->stepwise.min_height =
1; fsize->stepwise.min_width = 1; fsize->stepwise.max_height = 65520;
fsize->stepwise.max_width = 65520; I guess this new driver should be an
opportunity to fix that and distinguish between internal and external
frame size requirements and the .vidioc_enum_framesizes callback should
adapted accordingly. Regards, Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists