[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Znf0V9roQaUDu7_b@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 10:09:27 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wentong Wu <wentong.wu@...el.com>
Cc: tomas.winkler@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Chen <jason.z.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mei: vsc: Enhance SPI transfer of IVSC rom
Hi Wentong,
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 05:30:53PM +0800, Wentong Wu wrote:
> Constructing the SPI transfer command as per the specific request.
>
> Fixes: 566f5ca97680 ("mei: Add transport driver for IVSC device")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # for 6.8+
> Signed-off-by: Wentong Wu <wentong.wu@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Jason Chen <jason.z.chen@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/mei/vsc-tp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/vsc-tp.c b/drivers/misc/mei/vsc-tp.c
> index 4595b1a25536..7a89e4e5d553 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/mei/vsc-tp.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/mei/vsc-tp.c
> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ int vsc_tp_rom_xfer(struct vsc_tp *tp, const void *obuf, void *ibuf, size_t len)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ret = vsc_tp_dev_xfer(tp, tp->tx_buf, tp->rx_buf, len);
> + ret = vsc_tp_dev_xfer(tp, tp->tx_buf, ibuf ? tp->rx_buf : ibuf, len);
Is this correct? I.e. use ibuf when it's NULL, otherwise use tp->rx_buf?
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists