linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add gpu support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7d69e98d-a870-4200-8f22-2a16fcf02794@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:53:17 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>
Cc: freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio
 <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100: Add gpu support

On 23/06/2024 14:28, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 01:17:16PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/06/2024 13:06, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>> Add the necessary dt nodes for gpu support in X1E80100.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> +		gmu: gmu@...a000 {
>>> +			compatible = "qcom,adreno-gmu-x185.1", "qcom,adreno-gmu";
>>> +			reg = <0x0 0x03d50000 0x0 0x10000>,
>>> +			      <0x0 0x03d6a000 0x0 0x35000>,
>>> +			      <0x0 0x0b280000 0x0 0x10000>;
>>> +			reg-names =  "rscc", "gmu", "gmu_pdc";
>>
>> Really, please start testing your patches. Your internal instructions
>> tells you to do that, so please follow it carefully. Don't use the
>> community as the tool, because you do not want to run checks and
>> investigate results.
> 
> This was obviously tested before (and retested now) and everything works. I am
> confused about what you meant. Could you please elaborate a bit? The device
> and the compilation/test setup is new for me, so I am wondering if I
> made any silly mistake!

Eh, your DTS is not correct, but this could not be pointed out by tests,
because the binding does not work. :(

I'll fix up the binding and then please test on top of my patch (see
your internal guideline about necessary tests before sending any binding
or DTS patch).

Best regards,
Krzysztof