[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whPqqZVSeJiQsMvsAxtAmtR9iAuB4gg_1sUK2D-uBPpLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:07:37 -0400
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h:149:9: error: inline assembly
requires more registers than available
On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 at 13:48, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Now, from having looked a bit at this, I can point you to the
> differences introduced by having to have the emulation fallback.
Ahh.
Itr does all the same things *and* it has
"S" (_ptr)
as an added register pressure, because if we take the "call
cmpxchg8b_emu", we need the address in a fixed place.
I don't see any immediately obvious workaround.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists