[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jtrwgljegbiebihr3d5ccbhlokqxe5ovasg5xxxh4mrrw2ccux@24iebp7zkqqi>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:47:40 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] platform/arm64: build drivers even on non-ARM64
platforms
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 07:27:41PM GMT, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>
> > The Kconfig for platforms/arm64 has 'depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST'.
> > However due to Makefile having just obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) the subdir will
> > not be descended for !ARM64 platforms and thus the drivers won't get
> > built. This breaks modular builds of other driver drivers which depend
> > on arm64 platform drivers.
> >
> > Reported-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Fixes: 363c8aea2572 ("platform: Add ARM64 platform directory")
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/platform/Makefile | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/Makefile b/drivers/platform/Makefile
> > index fbbe4f77aa5d..837202842a6f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/Makefile
> > @@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OLPC_EC) += olpc/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_GOLDFISH) += goldfish/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CHROME_PLATFORMS) += chrome/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_SURFACE_PLATFORMS) += surface/
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64) += arm64/
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_PLATFORM_DEVICES) += arm64/
>
> I made a second ib tag with this patch.
Thank you!
> I'm a bit disappointed that LKP didn't catch this in the patch stage, it
> feels almost as if it never built any of the versions.
Yes, I had this feeling for several other patchsets. We started getting
build errors, despite having the patch on the maling list for quite a
while. I've just got the modpost build error for drm/msm driver, for the
patchset that was on the ML for weeks.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists