[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34a8b5b8-75ac-45b4-85d4-6b38aadf880c@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:57:11 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Danielle Ratson <danieller@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
linux@...linux.org.uk, sdf@...gle.com, kory.maincent@...tlin.com,
maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com, vladimir.oltean@....com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, ahmed.zaki@...el.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, shayagr@...zon.com,
paul.greenwalt@...el.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mlxsw@...dia.com, idosch@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 8/9] ethtool: cmis_fw_update: add a layer for
supporting firmware update using CDB
> +static int cmis_fw_update_reset(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + __u32 reset_data = ETH_RESET_PHY;
> +
> + return dev->ethtool_ops->reset(dev, &reset_data);
Is there a test somewhere that this op is actually implemented?
Maybe the next patch.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists