linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: stacktrace: fix the usage of ftrace_graph_ret

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:17:41 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Puranjay Mohan
 <puranjay@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, "Madhavan
 T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>, Kalesh Singh
 <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>, chenqiwu <qiwuchen55@...il.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 puranjay12@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: stacktrace: fix the usage of
 ftrace_graph_ret_addr()

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:43:18 +0100
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:

> > Catalin, Will, do you have any preference?  
> 
> I think it makes most sense if this patch travels together with
> 29c1c24a2707 ("function_graph: Fix up ftrace_graph_ret_addr()"), so that
> would be via Steve's tree. In which case:

That makes sense to me. I'll go around pulling in all the updates to the
arch code here (with the respective acks).

> 
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>

Thanks,

-- Steve