[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f8a151ea4cc9772cf5600eca14c8787640a69c93.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:44:02 +0000
From: Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) <Jason-JH.Lin@...iatek.com>
To: "mripard@...nel.org" <mripard@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Singo Chang (張興國) <Singo.Chang@...iatek.com>,
"linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"chunkuang.hu@...nel.org" <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"jason-jh.lin@...iatek.corp-partner.google.com"
<jason-jh.lin@...iatek.corp-partner.google.com>,
Jason-ch Chen (陳建豪)
<Jason-ch.Chen@...iatek.com>, Shawn Sung (宋孝謙)
<Shawn.Sung@...iatek.com>, Nancy Lin (林欣螢)
<Nancy.Lin@...iatek.com>, "daniel@...ll.ch" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"jkardatzke@...gle.com" <jkardatzke@...gle.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>, "airlied@...il.com"
<airlied@...il.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com"
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, "angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] Add mediate-drm secure flow for SVP
Hi Maxime,
On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 11:00 +0200, mripard@...nel.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 09:13:03AM GMT, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> >
[snip]
> > I have changed user space to use DMA_HEAP_IOCTL_ALLOC to allocate
> > secure buffer, but I still encounter the problem of determining
> > whether
> > the buffer is secure in mediatek-drm driver to add some secure
> > configure for hardware.
> >
> >
> > As the comment in [1], dma driver won't provide API for use.
> > [1]:
> >
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20240515112308.10171-3-yong.wu@mediatek.com/#25857255
> >
> >
> > So I use name checking at [PATCH v6 3/7] like this currently:
> >
> > struct drm_gem_object *mtk_gem_prime_import_sg_table(struct
> > drm_device
> > *dev,
> > struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, struct sg_table *sg)
> > {
> > struct mtk_gem_obj *mtk_gem;
> >
> > /* check if the entries in the sg_table are contiguous */
> > if (drm_prime_get_contiguous_size(sg) < attach->dmabuf->size) {
> > DRM_ERROR("sg_table is not contiguous");
> > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > }
> >
> > mtk_gem = mtk_gem_init(dev, attach->dmabuf->size);
> > if (IS_ERR(mtk_gem))
> > return ERR_CAST(mtk_gem);
> >
> > + mtk_gem->secure = (!strncmp(attach->dmabuf->exp_name,
> > "restricted",
> > 10));
> > mtk_gem->dma_addr = sg_dma_address(sg->sgl);
> > + mtk_gem->size = attach->dmabuf->size;
> > mtk_gem->sg = sg;
> >
> > return &mtk_gem->base;
> > }
> >
> > But I want to change this name checking to the information brought
> > from
> > user space.
> > I tried to use arg->flags to append the secure flag in user space
> > and
> > call drmPrimeHandleToFD() to pass it to DRM driver, but it will be
> > blocked by at the beginning of the drm_prime_handle_to_fd_ioctl().
>
> I agree with you, it's something to discuss mostly with the dma-buf
> maintainers but it would be better to just set a flag on the dma-buf,
> and use that flag whenever necessary.
>
> It might be related to the recent work I did to introduce allocation
> flags too:
>
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20240515-dma-buf-ecc-heap-v1-0-54cbbd049511@kernel.org/
>
Thanks for your information!
I'll discuss with dma-buf maintainer in series [1].
Regards,
Jason-JH Lin
> Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists