linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip:x86/mm v3 1/3] x86/mm: Use IPIs to synchronize LAM enablement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJD7tkbve6kKheCO5ZnqOgU_m6m-DaJH1nG=87EnF+L5HYX2kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 04:19:11 -0700
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, 
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip:x86/mm v3 1/3] x86/mm: Use IPIs to synchronize LAM enablement

On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 3:20 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 11:28 AM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 11:22 AM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 5/6/24 07:37, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > > > The merge window is approaching, is this patchset ready to be picked
> > > > up? Is any further action needed?
> > >
> > > Yosry, the merge window is when we send content to Linus.  We generally
> > > create that content weeks or months before the merge window.
> >
> > Right. The patch series has been idle for a long time so I assumed it
> > was going to be picked up for this merge window, but given how close
> > we have gotten I think we're past this now.
> >
> > That's fine, I am just trying to get some clarity on whether anything
> > else needs to be done for this to be in a mergeable state.
> >
> > >
> > > The best action on your here would be to touch base with Andy and make
> > > sure he's on board with the solution you think he suggested.
> >
> > I have been slightly pinging the series and/or resending every once in
> > a while, trying not to be too annoying :) Hopefully Andy will voice
> > his opinion.
>
> Hey Dave,
>
> I have tried reaching out to Andy on and off list, and didn't have any
> luck unfortunately :/
>
> Is there any way we can still make progress on getting the fixes in
> this series merged?

Friendly ping on this :)