linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] aoe: fix the potential use-after-free problem in more places

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 13:28:54 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Chun-Yi Lee <jlee@...e.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Chun-Yi Lee <joeyli.kernel@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
 Justin Sanders <justin@...aid.com>, Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>,
 Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.com>, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] aoe: fix the potential use-after-free problem in more
 places

>> Please reconsider the version identification in this patch subject once more.
>>
>>
>> …
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - Improve patch description
>> …
>>
>> How many patch variations were discussed and reviewed in the meantime?
>>
>
> Only v2. I sent v2 patch again because nobody response my code in patch.
> But I still want to grap comments for my code.

How does such a feedback fit to my previous patch review?
https://lore.kernel.org/r/e8331545-d261-44af-b500-93b90d77d8b7@web.de/
https://lkml.org/lkml/2024/5/14/551

Regards,
Markus