[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgdCs0883dpvZpyna76q9eVcTMvvUVAaBuJMPyrgOhNig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:17:50 -0400
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: arch/x86/include/asm/cmpxchg_32.h:149:9: error: inline assembly
requires more registers than available
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 09:59, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 03:36, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > A real fix, not only a workaround, is to rewrite asm arguments to
> > something like (untested, but "should work"TM):
>
> Sadly, I already tried that, and it didn't help.
Bah. I _had_ tried that, but I had tried it on __arch_cmpxchg64_emu(),
not on the "try" version.
And no, it hadn't helped.
But doing it *right*, and also doing __arch_try_cmpxchg64_emu() *does*
actually help.
Well, at least the attached patch compiles with the bad config and clang.
I'm not certain it does the right thing, because I did more than just
the %esi games to try to simplify it.
It's *ENTIRELY* possible that I screwed up. Just in this thread, I
have looked at the wrong inline asm at least twice now, so I'm not
feeling super-competent right now.
I'm sending the patch out in the hope that another set of eyes will
make it actually better.
Linus
View attachment "patch.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (2244 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists