lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240624082458.00006da1@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:24:58 -0700
From: Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@...lessos.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, Francisco Munoz
 <francisco.munoz.ruiz@...ux.intel.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
 David Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>, Ilpo Järvinen
 <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
 <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>, Mika Westerberg
 <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
 Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...lessos.org, Paul M Stillwell Jr
 <paul.m.stillwell.jr@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] PCI: vmd: Drop resetting PCI bus action after
 scan mapped PCI child bus

On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:21:45 +0800
Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@...lessos.org> wrote:

> According to "PCIe r6.0, sec 5.5.4", before enabling ASPM L1.2 on the
> PCIe Root Port and the child device, they should be programmed with
> the same LTR1.2_Threshold value. However, they have different values
> on VMD mapped PCI child bus. For example, Asus B1400CEAE's VMD mapped
> PCI bridge and NVMe SSD controller have different LTR1.2_Threshold
> values:
> 
> 10000:e0:06.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 11th Gen Core Processor
> PCIe Controller (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) ...
>     Capabilities: [200 v1] L1 PM Substates
>         L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1+
> L1_PM_Substates+ PortCommonModeRestoreTime=45us PortTPowerOnTime=50us
>         L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
>         	   T_CommonMode=45us LTR1.2_Threshold=101376ns
>         L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=50us
> 
> 10000:e1:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Sandisk Corp WD Blue
> SN550 NVMe SSD (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express]) ...
>     Capabilities: [900 v1] L1 PM Substates
>         L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
> L1_PM_Substates+ PortCommonModeRestoreTime=32us PortTPowerOnTime=10us
>         L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
>                    T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns
>         L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us
> 
> After debug in detail, both of the VMD mapped PCI bridge and the NVMe
> SSD controller have been configured properly with the same
> LTR1.2_Threshold value. But, become misconfigured after reset the VMD
> mapped PCI bus which is introduced from commit 0a584655ef89 ("PCI:
> vmd: Fix secondary bus reset for Intel bridges") and commit
> 6aab5622296b ("PCI: vmd: Clean up domain before enumeration"). So,
> drop the resetting PCI bus action after scan VMD mapped PCI child bus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@...lessos.org>
> ---
> v6:
> - Introduced based on the discussion
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/CAPpJ_efYWWxGBopbSQHB=Y2+1RrXFR2XWeqEhGTgdiw3XX0Jmw@mail.gmail.com/ 
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 20 --------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c index 5309afbe31f9..af413cdb4f4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> @@ -793,7 +793,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd,
> unsigned long features) resource_size_t offset[2] = {0};
>  	resource_size_t membar2_offset = 0x2000;
>  	struct pci_bus *child;
> -	struct pci_dev *dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -935,25 +934,6 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev
> *vmd, unsigned long features) pci_scan_child_bus(vmd->bus);
>  	vmd_domain_reset(vmd);
>  
> -	/* When Intel VMD is enabled, the OS does not discover the
> Root Ports
> -	 * owned by Intel VMD within the MMCFG space.
> pci_reset_bus() applies
> -	 * a reset to the parent of the PCI device supplied as
> argument. This
> -	 * is why we pass a child device, so the reset can be
> triggered at
> -	 * the Intel bridge level and propagated to all the children
> in the
> -	 * hierarchy.
> -	 */
> -	list_for_each_entry(child, &vmd->bus->children, node) {
> -		if (!list_empty(&child->devices)) {
> -			dev = list_first_entry(&child->devices,
> -					       struct pci_dev,
> bus_list);
> -			ret = pci_reset_bus(dev);
> -			if (ret)
> -				pci_warn(dev, "can't reset device:
> %d\n", ret); -
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
>  	pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(vmd->bus);
>  
>  	pci_walk_bus(vmd->bus, vmd_pm_enable_quirk, &features);

Thanks for the patch.

pci_reset_bus is required to avoid failure in vmd domain creation
during multiple soft reboots test. So I believe we can't just remove
it without proper testing. vmd_pm_enable_quirk happens after
pci_reset_bus, then how is it resetting LTR1.2_Threshold value?

Thanks
-nirmal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ