[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240624152732.1231678-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:15:13 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/6] perf: Make SIGTRAP and __perf_pending_irq() work on RT.
Hi,
Arnaldo reported that "perf test sigtrap" fails on PREEMPT_RT. Sending
the signal gets delayed until event_sched_out() which then uses
task_work_add() for its delivery. This breaks on PREEMPT_RT because the
signal is delivered with disabled preemption.
While looking at this, I also stumbled upon __perf_pending_irq() which
requires disabled interrupts but this is not the case on PREEMPT_RT.
This series aim to address both issues while not introducing a new issue
at the same time ;)
Any testing is appreciated.
v3…v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322065208.60456-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de/
- Rebased on top of Frederic's series
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240621091601.18227-1-frederic@kernel.org)
- Frederick pointed out that perf_pending_task() needs to
perf_swevent_get_recursion_context() in order not to recurse if
something within perf_swevent_.*_recursion_context() triggers a
software event. To address this, the counters have been moved to
the task_struct (#3 + #4) and preemt_disable() has been replaced
with a RCU-read lock (#5).
- The remaning logic same that means the event is pushed to task-work
instead of delivering from IRQ-work. The series was tested with
remove_on_exec as suggested by Marco Elver: On PREEMPT_RT a single
invocation passes, 100 parallel invocations report (for some)
unexpected SIGTRAPs and timeouts. This also observed on !RT
(without the series) with a higher task-count.
v2…v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240312180814.3373778-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de/
- Marco suggested to add a few comments
- Added a comment to __perf_event_overflow() to explain why irq_work
is raised in the in_nmi() case.
- Added a comment to perf_event_exit_event() to explain why the
pending event is deleted.
v1…v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240308175810.2894694-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de/
- Marco pointed me to the testsuite that showed two problems:
- Delayed task_work from NMI / missing events.
Fixed by triggering dummy irq_work to enforce an interrupt for
the exit-to-userland path which checks task_work
- Increased ref-count on clean up/ during exec.
Mostly addressed by the former change. There is still a window
if the NMI occurs during execve(). This is addressed by removing
the task_work before free_event().
The testsuite (remove_on_exec) fails sometimes if the event/
SIGTRAP is sent before the sighandler is installed.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists