linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/770] 5.10.220-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e8c38e1c-1f9a-47e2-bdf5-55a5c6a4d4ec@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:48:00 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org,
 patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
 jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
 srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
 allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/770] 5.10.220-rc1 review

On 6/18/24 05:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.220 release.
> There are 770 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:32:00 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

[ ... ]
> Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
>      SUNRPC: Prepare for xdr_stream-style decoding on the server-side
> 
The ChromeOS patches robot reports a number of fixes for the patches
applied in 5.5.220. This is one example, later fixed with commit
90bfc37b5ab9 ("SUNRPC: Fix svcxdr_init_decode's end-of-buffer
calculation"), but there are more. Are those fixes going to be
applied in a subsequent release of v5.10.y, was there a reason to
not include them, or did they get lost ?

Thanks,
Guenter