linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] dt-bindings: gpio: convert Atmel GPIO to json-schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240625-clerical-manicure-ebc8a1d1b16b@spud>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:34:40 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@...rochip.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl, robh@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
	claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, arnd@...db.de,
	durai.manickamkr@...rochip.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] dt-bindings: gpio: convert Atmel GPIO to
 json-schema

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:05:24AM +0530, Manikandan Muralidharan wrote:
> Convert the Atmel GPIO controller binding document to DT schema format
> using json-schema.
> The compatible string "microchip,sam9x7-gpio" is added as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@...rochip.com>
> ---
> changes in v2:
> - Fix bot errors with 'make dt_binding_check', missed to add
> "atmel,at91rm9200-gpio" as separate compatible for devices that uses it
> - Remove label from example
> - Add default entry for #gpio-lines property
> - Add new compatible string details in commit message
> ---
>  .../bindings/gpio/atmel,at91rm9200-gpio.yaml  | 81 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_atmel.txt   | 31 -------
>  2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/atmel,at91rm9200-gpio.yaml
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_atmel.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/atmel,at91rm9200-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/atmel,at91rm9200-gpio.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3dd70933ed8e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/atmel,at91rm9200-gpio.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/atmel,at91rm9200-gpio.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Microchip GPIO controller (PIO)
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Manikandan Muralidharan <manikandan.m@...rochip.com>
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - atmel,at91sam9x5-gpio
> +              - microchip,sam9x60-gpio
> +          - const: atmel,at91rm9200-gpio
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - microchip,sam9x7-gpio
> +          - const: microchip,sam9x60-gpio
> +          - const: atmel,at91rm9200-gpio

It's worth pointing out that this is required, because the driver
implements a different set of ops for the sam9x60. There's not just more
of them, they're different too.
Are the sam9x60 and at91rm9200 are actually compatible, or is the
fallback here some mistake that originated in the dts?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)