linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] workqueue: Improve scalability of workqueue watchdog touch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Znr2_fjb1UY-Rakp@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 06:57:33 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] workqueue: Improve scalability of workqueue watchdog
 touch

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 09:42:45PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On a ~2000 CPU powerpc system, hard lockups have been observed in the
> workqueue code when stop_machine runs (in this case due to CPU hotplug).
> This is due to lots of CPUs spinning in multi_cpu_stop, calling
> touch_nmi_watchdog() which ends up calling wq_watchdog_touch().
> wq_watchdog_touch() writes to the global variable wq_watchdog_touched,
> and that can find itself in the same cacheline as other important
> workqueue data, which slows down operations to the point of lockups.
> 
> In the case of the following abridged trace, worker_pool_idr was in
> the hot line, causing the lockups to always appear at idr_find.
> 
>   watchdog: CPU 1125 self-detected hard LOCKUP @ idr_find
>   Call Trace:
>   get_work_pool
>   __queue_work
>   call_timer_fn
>   run_timer_softirq
>   __do_softirq
>   do_softirq_own_stack
>   irq_exit
>   timer_interrupt
>   decrementer_common_virt
>   * interrupt: 900 (timer) at multi_cpu_stop
>   multi_cpu_stop
>   cpu_stopper_thread
>   smpboot_thread_fn
>   kthread
> 
> Fix this by having wq_watchdog_touch() only write to the line if the
> last time a touch was recorded exceeds 1/4 of the watchdog threshold.
> 
> Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>

Applied 1-2 to wq/for-6.11. I think 3 and 4 should probably be routed
through either tip or Andrew?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun