[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240625111522.045d2302959ce8dde7f47826@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:15:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "yongfa.hu" <hushange@....com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: remove partial comments of kswapd_shrink_node head
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:15:47 +0800 "yongfa.hu" <hushange@....com> wrote:
> when function kswapd_shrink_node return, it will not check the condition
> mentioned in the removed comments: "if the lack of progress was
> due to pages under writeback", so remove it.
Is this correct? shrink_folio_list() can skip under-writeback pages?
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -6747,8 +6747,7 @@ static bool prepare_kswapd_sleep(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> * zone that is currently unbalanced.
> *
> * Returns true if kswapd scanned at least the requested number of pages to
> - * reclaim or if the lack of progress was due to pages under writeback.
> - * This is used to determine if the scanning priority needs to be raised.
> + * reclaim. This is used to determine if the scanning priority needs to be raised.
> */
> static bool kswapd_shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat,
> struct scan_control *sc)
> --
> 2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists