[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6416f18e-f4cd-41da-9b46-b3b1f67d7170@bp.renesas.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:56:24 +0100
From: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@...renesas.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Clean up and refactor OEN
read/write functions
On 17/06/2024 13:02, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 1:33 PM Paul Barker
> <paul.barker.ct@...renesas.com> wrote:
>> -static u8 rzg3s_pin_to_oen_bit(u32 offset, u8 pin, u8 max_port)
>> +static u32 rzg3s_read_oen(struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl, u32 caps, unsigned int _pin)
>> {
>> - if (pin)
>> - pin *= 2;
>> + u32 port = RZG2L_PIN_ID_TO_PORT(_pin);
>> + u8 pin = RZG2L_PIN_ID_TO_PIN(_pin);
>
> It's OK to use RZG2L_PIN_ID_TO_PIN() unconditionally, as RZ/G3S does
> not have any dedicated pins with the OEN capability, right?
I thought about this a bit and came to the conclusion that no, it's not
ok.
For RZ/G2L, only mux'd pins have OEN capability (Ethernet TXC/TX_CLK
only).
For RZ/G3S, OEN capability also exists on XSPI/OCTA pins which are
dedicated pins. We don't currently support OEN for these pins in the
driver, but we should put a check in place now to be safe. I've done
this in v3 which I'm about to send...
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0x27F4B3459F002257.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3521 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (237 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists