[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <667b4f4a46cc6_563929472@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:14:18 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>, "Davidlohr
Bueso" <dave@...olabs.net>, Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alison Schofield
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, "Ira
Weiny" <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/acpi: Warn on unsupported platform config detection
Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> Each Host Bridge instance has a corresponding CXL Host Bridge Structure
> (CHBS) ACPI table that identifies its capabilities. CHBS tables can be
> two types: RCRB and CHBCR.
>
> If a Host Bridge is attached to a device that is operating in Restricted
> CXL Device Mode (RCD), BIOS publishes an RCRB with the base address of
> registers that describe its capabilities.
>
> However, the new (CXL 2.0+) Component registers (e.g., Extended Security
> Capability), can only be accessed by means of a base address published
> with a CHBCR.
>
> An algorithm to locate a CHBCR associated with an RCRB would be too
> invasive to land without some concrete motivation.
>
> Therefore, just print a message to inform of unsupported config.
>
> Count how many different CHBS "Version" types are detected by
> cxl_get_chbs_iter(). Then make cxl_get_chbs() print a warning if that sum
> is greater than 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> index 571069863c62..9e226a65a5ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> @@ -482,6 +482,7 @@ struct cxl_chbs_context {
> unsigned long long uid;
> resource_size_t base;
> u32 cxl_version;
> + int count;
> };
>
> static int cxl_get_chbs_iter(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
> @@ -490,10 +491,17 @@ static int cxl_get_chbs_iter(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
> struct cxl_chbs_context *ctx = arg;
> struct acpi_cedt_chbs *chbs;
>
> - if (ctx->base != CXL_RESOURCE_NONE)
> + chbs = (struct acpi_cedt_chbs *) header;
> +
> + if (chbs->cxl_version == ACPI_CEDT_CHBS_VERSION_CXL11 &&
> + chbs->length != CXL_RCRB_SIZE)
> return 0;
>
> - chbs = (struct acpi_cedt_chbs *) header;
> + if (ctx->cxl_version != chbs->cxl_version)
> + ctx->count++;
> +
> + if (ctx->base != CXL_RESOURCE_NONE)
> + return 0;
>
> if (ctx->uid != chbs->uid)
> return 0;
> @@ -502,10 +510,6 @@ static int cxl_get_chbs_iter(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
> if (!chbs->base)
> return 0;
>
> - if (chbs->cxl_version == ACPI_CEDT_CHBS_VERSION_CXL11 &&
> - chbs->length != CXL_RCRB_SIZE)
> - return 0;
> -
> ctx->base = chbs->base;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -533,6 +537,10 @@ static int cxl_get_chbs(struct device *dev, struct acpi_device *hb,
>
> acpi_table_parse_cedt(ACPI_CEDT_TYPE_CHBS, cxl_get_chbs_iter, ctx);
>
> + if (ctx->count > 1)
> + /* Disclaim eRCD support given some component register may only be found via CHBCR */
> + dev_info(dev, "Unsupported platform config, mixed Virtual Host and Restricted CXL Host hierarchy.");
I believe this is already queued, but my personal preference is that
multiline statements include brackets, or move the comment above the "if
()", so either:
/* Disclaim eRCD support given some component register may only be found via CHBCR */
if (ctx->count > 1)
dev_info(dev, "Unsupported platform config, mixed Virtual Host and Restricted CXL Host hierarchy.");
...or:
if (ctx->count > 1) {
/* Disclaim eRCD support given some component register may only be found via CHBCR */
dev_info(dev, "Unsupported platform config, mixed Virtual Host and Restricted CXL Host hierarchy.");
}
...but don't spin the patch just for that fixup.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists