[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZntZcRgm-zok7kyb@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:57:37 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...nel.org,
joshdon@...gle.com, brho@...gle.com, pjt@...gle.com,
derkling@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, dvernet@...a.com,
dschatzberg@...a.com, dskarlat@...cmu.edu, riel@...riel.com,
changwoo@...lia.com, himadrics@...ia.fr, memxor@...il.com,
andrea.righi@...onical.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/39] sched: Add sched_class->reweight_task()
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 09:29:54AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 01:59:02PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > Were you trying to say that if the idle policy were to implement
> > ->reweight_task(), it wouldn't be called?
>
> This. IDLE really is FAIR but with a really small weight.
Oh, right, I got confused (again) by the idle class and SCHED_IDLE. Will
fix.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists