[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240625072954.GQ31592@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:29:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...nel.org,
joshdon@...gle.com, brho@...gle.com, pjt@...gle.com,
derkling@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, dvernet@...a.com,
dschatzberg@...a.com, dskarlat@...cmu.edu, riel@...riel.com,
changwoo@...lia.com, himadrics@...ia.fr, memxor@...il.com,
andrea.righi@...onical.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/39] sched: Add sched_class->reweight_task()
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 01:59:02PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Were you trying to say that if the idle policy were to implement
> ->reweight_task(), it wouldn't be called?
This. IDLE really is FAIR but with a really small weight.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists