[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+GgBR8JoeUPKVs6h3-ucJk_AuzKyn6TWb0ZozsXYqcxSsmFuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:12:48 +0300
From: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...libre.com>
To: "Ceclan, Dumitru" <mitrutzceclan@...il.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, dlechner@...libre.com, dumitru.ceclan@...log.com0,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dumitru Ceclan <dumitru.ceclan@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad_sigma_delta: fix disable_one callback
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 12:45 PM Ceclan, Dumitru
<mitrutzceclan@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 21/06/2024 16:26, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 3:05 PM Dumitru Ceclan <mitrutzceclan@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The ADC ad7192 is a sigma delta ADC with a sequencer that does not
> >> require a disable_one callback as all enable channel bits are within
> >> the same register.
> >>
> >> Remove the requirement of the disable_one callback for sigma delta ADCs
> >> with a sequencer.
> >>
> >> This patch could be squashed with the commit that it fixes from patch
> >> series: Add support for AD411x
> >>
> >
> > This fix looks fine.
> > But, then this raises a question if this needs be to extended to the
> > `disable_all` and maybe `indio_dev->info->update_scan_mode` check.
> > And if so, how should this be handled?
> >
> > For example:
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c: .disable_all = ad7124_disable_all,
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7173.c: .disable_all = ad7173_disable_all,
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c: .disable_all = ad7192_disable_all,
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c: .disable_all = ad7192_disable_all,
> >
> > And:
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7124.c: ret = ad_sd_init(&st->sd, indio_dev, spi,
> > &ad7124_sigma_delta_info);
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7173.c: ret = ad_sd_init(&st->sd, indio_dev, spi,
> > &ad7173_sigma_delta_info);
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c: ret = ad_sd_init(&st->sd, indio_dev, spi,
> > st->chip_info->sigma_delta_info);
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7780.c: ad_sd_init(&st->sd, indio_dev, spi,
> > &ad7780_sigma_delta_info);
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7791.c: ad_sd_init(&st->sd, indio_dev, spi,
> > &ad7791_sigma_delta_info);
> > drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c: ad_sd_init(&st->sd, indio_dev, spi,
> > &ad7793_sigma_delta_info);
> >
> > At least the ad7791.c & ad7793.c drivers support parts with more than
> > 1 channel, and there does not seem to be any `disable_all` hook
> > defined (at least in iio/testing).
> > I have not gone too deep with `indio_dev->info->update_scan_mode`, but
> > it would be worth to do a check there as well
> >
> >
>
> disable_all and update_scan_mode callbacks are required only when the ADC
> features a sequencer, as in you can enable more than one channel at a time
> and the ADC will automatically cycle conversions through all enabled channels.
>
> This feature is signaled by setting the ad_sigma_delta_info.num_slots attribute
> to a value >1. The only drivers that set .num_slot from what I see are:
> ad7173, ad7192, ad7124. So only these 3 are relevant in this discussion.
>
> For ad7192, disable_all() is useless as both ad7192_set_channel() and
> ad7192_update_scan_mode() actually set to 0 other channel enable bits.
>
> I do not see any reason at this moment to extend this to disable_all and
> update_scan_mode.
Ack.
Thanks for the explanation :)
I think I also misread the code there; I was thinking num_slots is
related to the number of channels.
>
> >> Fixes: a25a0aab2187 ("iio: adc: ad_sigma_delta: add disable_one callback")
> >> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceclan <dumitru.ceclan@...log.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c | 5 -----
> >> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> >> index d6b5fca034a0..8c062b0d26e3 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> >> @@ -672,11 +672,6 @@ int ad_sd_init(struct ad_sigma_delta *sigma_delta, struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >> dev_err(&spi->dev, "ad_sigma_delta_info lacks disable_all().\n");
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >> -
> >> - if (!info->disable_one) {
> >> - dev_err(&spi->dev, "ad_sigma_delta_info lacks disable_one().\n");
> >> - return -EINVAL;
> >> - }
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (info->irq_line)
> >> --
> >> 2.43.0
> >>
> >>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists