[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edeaa699-7cfe-44ed-abde-7cf3d3efe3bf@web.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:00:15 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Neal Liu <neal_liu@...eedtech.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for
ast udc
> We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host
> may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array.
Why did you not choose an imperative wording for your change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n94
> Found by static analysis.
Were any special tools involved?
How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists