linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Handle the inconsistency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:41:27 +0000
From: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>
To: <rafael@...nel.org>, <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
	<mario.limonciello@....com>, <perry.yuan@....com>,
	<skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, <li.meng@....com>, <ray.huang@....com>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Dhananjay
 Ugwekar" <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Handle the inconsistency 

cpudata->nominal_freq being in MHz whereas other frequencies being in
KHz breaks the amd-pstate-ut frequency sanity check. This fixes it.

Fixes: 14eb1c96e3a3 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add test module for amd-pstate driver")
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
index fc275d41d51e..66b73c308ce6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
@@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
 	int cpu = 0;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
 	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
+	u32 nominal_freq_khz;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
@@ -209,13 +210,14 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
 			break;
 		cpudata = policy->driver_data;
 
-		if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= cpudata->nominal_freq) &&
-			(cpudata->nominal_freq > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
+		nominal_freq_khz = cpudata->nominal_freq*1000;
+		if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= nominal_freq_khz) &&
+			(nominal_freq_khz > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
 			(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq > cpudata->min_freq) &&
 			(cpudata->min_freq > 0))) {
 			amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
 			pr_err("%s cpu%d max=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > min=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
-				__func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, cpudata->nominal_freq,
+				__func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, nominal_freq_khz,
 				cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, cpudata->min_freq);
 			goto skip_test;
 		}
@@ -229,13 +231,13 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
 
 		if (cpudata->boost_supported) {
 			if ((policy->max == cpudata->max_freq) ||
-					(policy->max == cpudata->nominal_freq))
+					(policy->max == nominal_freq_khz))
 				amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
 			else {
 				amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
 				pr_err("%s cpu%d policy_max=%d should be equal cpu_max=%d or cpu_nominal=%d !\n",
 					__func__, cpu, policy->max, cpudata->max_freq,
-					cpudata->nominal_freq);
+					nominal_freq_khz);
 				goto skip_test;
 			}
 		} else {
-- 
2.34.1