[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0763d386dfd0d4b4a28744bac744b5e823144f0b.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:59:50 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>, brauner@...nel.org
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vfs: support statx(..., NULL, AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...)
On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 17:18 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> + if ((sx->flags & (AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_STATX_SYNC_TYPE)) ==
> + (AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_STATX_SYNC_TYPE) &&
> + vfs_empty_path(sx->dfd, path)) {
> sx->filename = NULL;
> - return ret;
AT_STATX_SYNC_TYPE == AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC | AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC but
AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC and AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC obviously contradicts with
each other. Thus valid uses of statx won't satisfy this condition.
And I guess the condition here should be same as the condition in
SYSCALL_DEFINE5(statx) or am I wrong?
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
Powered by blists - more mailing lists