lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:59:50 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>, brauner@...nel.org
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, 
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vfs: support statx(..., NULL, AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...)

On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 17:18 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> +	if ((sx->flags & (AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_STATX_SYNC_TYPE)) ==
> +	    (AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_STATX_SYNC_TYPE) &&
> +	    vfs_empty_path(sx->dfd, path)) {
>  		sx->filename = NULL;
> -		return ret;

AT_STATX_SYNC_TYPE == AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC | AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC but
AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC and AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC obviously contradicts with
each other.  Thus valid uses of statx won't satisfy this condition.

And I guess the condition here should be same as the condition in
SYSCALL_DEFINE5(statx) or am I wrong?

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ