[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <171937396645.2856613.6564241960168759110.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:53:07 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Spoorthy S <spoorts2@...ibm.com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Make test_arm_callgraph_fp.sh more robust
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:03:14 +0100, James Clark wrote:
> The 2 second sleep can cause the test to fail on very slow network file
> systems because Perf ends up being killed before it finishes starting
> up.
>
> Fix it by making the leafloop workload end after a fixed time like the
> other workloads so there is no need to kill it after 2 seconds.
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists