linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: codecs: lpass-macro: Gracefully handle unknown version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <171942311637.1650281.3350190675006482081.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 18:31:56 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, 
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
 Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, 
 Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...cinc.com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, 
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: codecs: lpass-macro: Gracefully handle
 unknown version

On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:57:35 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Qualcomm LPASS macro codec driver parses registers in order to
> detect version of the codec.  It recognizes codecs v2.0 - v2.8, however
> we know that there are earlier versions and 'enum lpass_codec_version'
> has also v1.0, v1.1 and v1.2.  If by any chance we run on unrecognized
> version, driver will use random value from the stack as the codec
> version.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] ASoC: codecs: lpass-macro: Gracefully handle unknown version
      commit: ebc1a54051b58d1aa3a8855faac8bf16b88b8af7
[2/2] ASoC: codecs: lpass-macro: Use enum for handling codec version
      commit: 06462d6f3fb3c445b5abac7b134d9fe9e361113f

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark