| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAN6iL-T8Bt1Gz+YrqTvMzBs=AYN4x67TQW4OqnU-nYSOcj2Sdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:38:43 +0530
From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@...gle.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Georgi Djakov <quic_c_gdjako@...cinc.com>,
"moderated list:ARM SMMU DRIVERS" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu: Pretty-print context fault related regs
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:08 PM Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>
> Parse out the bitfields for easier-to-read fault messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> ---
> I kept with the dev_err, which matches qcom_smmu_context_fault. It is
> only adding two extra lines, and it is ratelimited.
>
> I also converted qcom_smmu_context_fault() to use the helpers to do the
> parsing, rather than more or less duplicating.
>
> .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c | 21 +++---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 58 +++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c
> index 552199cbd9e2..ee7eab273e1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c
> @@ -429,22 +429,17 @@ irqreturn_t qcom_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
> phys_addr_t phys_atos = qcom_smmu_verify_fault(smmu_domain, iova, fsr);
>
> if (__ratelimit(&_rs)) {
> + char buf[80];
Super Nit: I'm not a fan of hardcoding the buffer size but I'm also not sure
if this makes a strong enough case for a macro definition. Any thoughts, anyone?
> +
> dev_err(smmu->dev,
> "Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x%x, iova=0x%08lx, fsynr=0x%x, cbfrsynra=0x%x, cb=%d\n",
> fsr, iova, fsynr, cbfrsynra, idx);
> - dev_err(smmu->dev,
> - "FSR = %08x [%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s], SID=0x%x\n",
> - fsr,
> - (fsr & 0x02) ? "TF " : "",
> - (fsr & 0x04) ? "AFF " : "",
> - (fsr & 0x08) ? "PF " : "",
> - (fsr & 0x10) ? "EF " : "",
> - (fsr & 0x20) ? "TLBMCF " : "",
> - (fsr & 0x40) ? "TLBLKF " : "",
> - (fsr & 0x80) ? "MHF " : "",
> - (fsr & 0x40000000) ? "SS " : "",
> - (fsr & 0x80000000) ? "MULTI " : "",
> - cbfrsynra);
> +
> + arm_smmu_parse_fsr(buf, fsr);
> + dev_err(smmu->dev, "FSR: %s\n", buf);
> +
> + arm_smmu_parse_fsynr0(buf, fsynr);
> + dev_err(smmu->dev, "FSYNR0: %s\n", buf);
>
> dev_err(smmu->dev,
> "soft iova-to-phys=%pa\n", &phys_soft);
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index 87c81f75cf84..7f5ca75d5ebe 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -405,12 +405,67 @@ static const struct iommu_flush_ops arm_smmu_s2_tlb_ops_v1 = {
> .tlb_add_page = arm_smmu_tlb_add_page_s2_v1,
> };
>
> +void arm_smmu_parse_fsr(char buf[80], u32 fsr)
> +{
> + static const struct {
> + u32 mask;
> + const char *name;
> + } fsr_bits[] = {
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_MULTI, "MULTI" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_SS, "SS" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_UUT, "UUT" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_ASF, "ASF" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_TLBLKF, "TLBLKF" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_TLBMCF, "TLBMCF" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_EF, "EF" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_PF, "PF" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_AFF, "AFF" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_TF, "TF" },
> + };
> + char *p = buf;
> +
> + p += sprintf(p, "FORMAT=%u",
> + (u32)FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_FORMAT, fsr));
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fsr_bits); i++)
> + if (fsr & fsr_bits[i].mask)
> + p += sprintf(p, "|%s", fsr_bits[i].name);
> +}
Buffer overflow alert: I suggest passing the buffer size as an
additional "size" parameter to the function.
Based on that size parameter, we must ensure that `p` doesn't reach
out of bounds.
Maybe using snprintf() to limit the num of characters to the "size"
parameter would make more sense.
> +
> +void arm_smmu_parse_fsynr0(char buf[80], u32 fsynr)
Ditto, for this function and also for the signatures in the .h file.
> +{
> + static const struct {
> + u32 mask;
> + const char *name;
> + } fsynr0_bits[] = {
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_WNR, "WNR" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_PNU, "PNU" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_IND, "IND" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_NSATTR, "NSATTR" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_PTWF, "PTWF" },
> + { ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_AFR, "AFR" },
> + };
> + char *p = buf;
> +
> + p += sprintf(p, "S1CBNDX=%u",
> + (u32)FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_S1CBNDX, fsynr));
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fsynr0_bits); i++)
> + if (fsynr & fsynr0_bits[i].mask)
> + p += sprintf(p, "|%s", fsynr0_bits[i].name);
> +
> + p += sprintf(p, "|PLVL=%u",
> + (u32)FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_PLVL, fsynr));
> +}
> +
> static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
> {
> u32 fsr, fsynr, cbfrsynra;
> unsigned long iova;
> struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = dev;
> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> + static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
> + DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
> int idx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -423,13 +478,22 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_context_fault(int irq, void *dev)
> cbfrsynra = arm_smmu_gr1_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR1_CBFRSYNRA(idx));
>
> ret = report_iommu_fault(&smmu_domain->domain, NULL, iova,
> - fsynr & ARM_SMMU_FSYNR0_WNR ? IOMMU_FAULT_WRITE : IOMMU_FAULT_READ);
> + fsynr & ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_WNR ? IOMMU_FAULT_WRITE : IOMMU_FAULT_READ);
> +
> + if (ret == -ENOSYS && __ratelimit(&rs)) {
> + char buf[80];
>
> - if (ret == -ENOSYS)
> - dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> + dev_err(smmu->dev,
> "Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x%x, iova=0x%08lx, fsynr=0x%x, cbfrsynra=0x%x, cb=%d\n",
> fsr, iova, fsynr, cbfrsynra, idx);
>
> + arm_smmu_parse_fsr(buf, fsr);
> + dev_err(smmu->dev, "FSR: %s\n", buf);
> +
> + arm_smmu_parse_fsynr0(buf, fsynr);
> + dev_err(smmu->dev, "FSYNR0: %s\n", buf);
> + }
> +
> arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, idx, ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR, fsr);
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> index 4765c6945c34..763ea52fca64 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> @@ -196,34 +196,46 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_PAR_F BIT(0)
>
> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR 0x58
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_MULTI BIT(31)
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_SS BIT(30)
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_UUT BIT(8)
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_ASF BIT(7)
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_TLBLKF BIT(6)
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_TLBMCF BIT(5)
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_EF BIT(4)
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_PF BIT(3)
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_AFF BIT(2)
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_TF BIT(1)
> -
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_IGN (ARM_SMMU_FSR_AFF | \
> - ARM_SMMU_FSR_ASF | \
> - ARM_SMMU_FSR_TLBMCF | \
> - ARM_SMMU_FSR_TLBLKF)
> -
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_FAULT (ARM_SMMU_FSR_MULTI | \
> - ARM_SMMU_FSR_SS | \
> - ARM_SMMU_FSR_UUT | \
> - ARM_SMMU_FSR_EF | \
> - ARM_SMMU_FSR_PF | \
> - ARM_SMMU_FSR_TF | \
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_MULTI BIT(31)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_SS BIT(30)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_FORMAT GENMASK(10, 9)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_UUT BIT(8)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_ASF BIT(7)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_TLBLKF BIT(6)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_TLBMCF BIT(5)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_EF BIT(4)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_PF BIT(3)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_AFF BIT(2)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_TF BIT(1)
> +
> +void arm_smmu_parse_fsr(char buf[80], u32 fsr);
> +
> +#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_IGN (ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_AFF | \
> + ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_ASF | \
> + ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_TLBMCF | \
> + ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_TLBLKF)
> +
> +#define ARM_SMMU_FSR_FAULT (ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_MULTI | \
> + ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_SS | \
> + ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_UUT | \
> + ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_EF | \
> + ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_PF | \
> + ARM_SMMU_CB_FSR_TF | \
> ARM_SMMU_FSR_IGN)
>
> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_FAR 0x60
>
> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0 0x68
> -#define ARM_SMMU_FSYNR0_WNR BIT(4)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_PLVL GENMASK(1, 0)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_WNR BIT(4)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_PNU BIT(5)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_IND BIT(6)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_NSATTR BIT(8)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_PTWF BIT(10)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_AFR BIT(11)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR0_S1CBNDX GENMASK(23, 16)
> +
> +void arm_smmu_parse_fsynr0(char buf[80], u32 fsynr);
Apart from the buffer overflow, everything else looks fine to me.
>
> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_FSYNR1 0x6c
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists