linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: arm64: Refine PMU defines for number of counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:32:35 -0600
From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, 
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, 
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, 
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, 
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, 
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, 
 Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, 
 James Morse <james.morse@....com>, 
 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, 
 Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, 
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, 
 James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: arm64: Refine PMU defines for number of
 counters

There are 2 defines for the number of PMU counters:
ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS and ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS. Both are the same
currently, but Armv9.4/8.9 increases the number of possible counters
from 32 to 33. With this change, the maximum number of counters will
differ for KVM's PMU emulation which is PMUv3.4. Give KVM PMU emulation
its own define to decouple it from the rest of the kernel's number PMU
counters.

The VHE PMU code needs to match the PMU driver, so switch it to use
ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS instead.

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c      | 8 ++++----
 arch/arm64/kvm/pmu.c           | 5 +++--
 include/kvm/arm_pmu.h          | 3 ++-
 include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h | 2 --
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index 69be070a9378..566a0e120306 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	int i;
 	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
 		pmu->pmc[i].idx = i;
 }
 
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
 		kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(kvm_vcpu_idx_to_pmc(vcpu, i));
 	irq_work_sync(&vcpu->arch.pmu.overflow_work);
 }
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_enable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
 	if (!(kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(vcpu) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E) || !val)
 		return;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++) {
 		struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
 
 		if (!(val & BIT(i)))
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_disable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
 	if (!kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) || !val)
 		return;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++) {
 		struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
 
 		if (!(val & BIT(i)))
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu.c
index a47ae311d4a8..215b74875815 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
  */
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
+#include <linux/perf/arm_pmu.h>
 #include <linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h>
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_pmu_events, kvm_pmu_events);
@@ -95,7 +96,7 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_pmu_enable_el0(unsigned long events)
 	u64 typer;
 	u32 counter;
 
-	for_each_set_bit(counter, &events, 32) {
+	for_each_set_bit(counter, &events, ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS) {
 		typer = kvm_vcpu_pmu_read_evtype_direct(counter);
 		typer &= ~ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL0;
 		kvm_vcpu_pmu_write_evtype_direct(counter, typer);
@@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_pmu_disable_el0(unsigned long events)
 	u64 typer;
 	u32 counter;
 
-	for_each_set_bit(counter, &events, 32) {
+	for_each_set_bit(counter, &events, ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS) {
 		typer = kvm_vcpu_pmu_read_evtype_direct(counter);
 		typer |= ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL0;
 		kvm_vcpu_pmu_write_evtype_direct(counter, typer);
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
index 871067fb2616..e08aeec5d936 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
 #include <linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h>
 
+#define KVM_ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS	32
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
 struct kvm_pmc {
@@ -25,7 +26,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu_events {
 struct kvm_pmu {
 	struct irq_work overflow_work;
 	struct kvm_pmu_events events;
-	struct kvm_pmc pmc[ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS];
+	struct kvm_pmc pmc[KVM_ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS];
 	int irq_num;
 	bool created;
 	bool irq_level;
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h
index f4ec76f725a3..4f7a7f2222e5 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmuv3.h
@@ -7,8 +7,6 @@
 #define __PERF_ARM_PMUV3_H
 
 #define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS	31
-#define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS	32
-
 #define ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX		31
 
 

-- 
2.43.0