linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm/filemap: Limit page cache size to that supported by xarray

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7891f768-cc4d-44c3-83b0-004536a01a85@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 09:05:25 +1000
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 djwong@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org, hughd@...gle.com,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, zhenyzha@...hat.com, shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm/filemap: Limit page cache size to that supported
 by xarray

On 6/27/24 6:38 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:37:00 +1000 Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> I rechecked the history, it's a bit hard to have precise fix tag for PATCH[4].
>> Please let me know if you have a better one for PATCH[4].
>>
>> #4
>>     Fixes: 800d8c63b2e9 ("shmem: add huge pages support")
>>     Cc: stable@...nel.org # v4.10+
>>     Fixes: 552446a41661 ("shmem: Convert shmem_add_to_page_cache to XArray")
>>     Cc: stable@...nel.org # v4.20+
>> #3
>>     Fixes: 793917d997df ("mm/readahead: Add large folio readahead")
>>     Cc: stable@...nel.org # v5.18+
>> #2
>>     Fixes: 4687fdbb805a ("mm/filemap: Support VM_HUGEPAGE for file mappings")
>>     Cc: stable@...nel.org # v5.18+
>> #1
>>     Fixes: 793917d997df ("mm/readahead: Add large folio readahead")
>>     Cc: stable@...nel.org # v5.18+
>>
>> I probably need to move PATCH[3] before PATCH[2] since PATCH[1] and PATCH[2]
>> point to same commit.
> 
> OK, thanks.
> 
> I assume you'll be sending a new revision of the series.  And Ryan had
> comments.  Please incorporate the above into the updated changelogs as
> best you can.
> 

Yes, I will post a new revision where all pending comments will be addressed.

Thanks,
Gavin