lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:45:14 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>, "Fabio M. De Francesco"
	<fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Jonathan Cameron
	<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, "Vishal
 Verma" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, "Dan
 Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl/acpi: Warn on unsupported platform config detection

Alison Schofield wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 02:59:41PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> 
> Fabio,
> 
> cxl/acpi does a lot of platform config work. "...unsupported platform
> config detection" gives no hint that this is about CHBS's or an eRCD.
> Please offer something more specific. Thanks.

The message specifies "mixed Virtual Host and Restricted CXL Host
hierarchy" as the conflict. The relationship between RCH and eRCDs is an
exercise for the reader, and CHBS is an ACPI detail that really should
not be emitted in an error message. So I am struggling to imagine what a
more specific error message would be without paragraphs of backstory.

All that is needed here is just enough words for when someone posts a
problem to the list that someone savvy can go "ah, you fell into this
specification hole where CXL 2.0 root port registers are difficult to
associate with an RCH config, thanks for the report now we know that
Linux needs to worry about this case".

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ