linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFT v3 0/5] Add sc7180 camss subsys support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADgMGStpV1XZCKavw8pgW+ReTCaDZ+_52367HvWOGHLPfb0pYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:49:42 +0800
From: george chan <gchan9527@...il.com>
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, 
	Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, 
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT v3 0/5] Add sc7180 camss subsys support

On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 7:44 AM Bryan O'Donoghue
<bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 25/06/2024 17:57, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > On 24.06.2024 5:03 PM, george chan wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:50 PM Bryan O'Donoghue
> >> <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 24/06/2024 13:13, George Chan via B4 Relay wrote:
> >>>> - Add RFT tag to all patches, since no tested-by at all.
> >>>
> >>> Have you not tested this updated series ?
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> bod
> >>
> >> Do you wanna add my tested-by too? It just feels weird to add my
> >> tested-by that way.
> >
> > "RFT" means "I didn't actually test this" or "please provide more testing",
> > not "there have not been tested-by's from others"
> >
> > Konrad
>
> Exactly, RFT says to me "someone else needs to add testing here".
>

gotcha.

> In your next drop with the changes and RBs please drop RFT - unless you
> want someone else to test it for you.
>

If the test result on sm7125 is convincing then I have no problem.

> I don't think that's required right now since the set seems
> straight-forward enough and TBH the bit of 7180 hardware I have sits in
> a box unopened and will likely stay that way for the next few months at
> least.
>
> I think your example video is proof enough the thing works ;)
Nice to hear.
>
> ---
> bod