[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d256cd72ef2011c3bfd045b04fb6509d1ac827e9.camel@codeconstruct.com.au>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:00:34 +0800
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>
To: "Aniket ." <aniketmaurya@...gle.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Billy Tsai
<billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i3c: dw: Add property to select IBI ops
Hi Aniket,
> > For cases where no other special behaviour is required, we can
> > represent this just as an entry in the OF match table.
>
> Actually I see that IBI support is always present in the HW(DW I3C
> IP). It's just that we have an option in SW to decide whether to
> populate function pointers for IBI or not.
OK, in that case this /definitely/ doesn't belong in the DT then, as
it's purely software configuration.
> So can we remove this selection of ops and always go with ibi ops?
Sounds fine to me, but I don't have direct experience with the non-
ast2600 uses of the dw core.
Cheers,
Jeremy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists