[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKa-r6uqO20RB-fEVRifAEE_hLA50Zch=wbKtX8vNt5m6kE5_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:01:45 +0200
From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
To: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/9] net/sched: cls_flower: prepare
fl_{set,dump}_key_flags() for ENC_FLAGS
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 11:49 AM Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> So, we must htonl() the policy mask in the second hunk in patch 7,something like:
>
or maybe better (but still untested), use NLA_BE32, like netfilter does in [1]
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/A/ident/NF_NAT_RANGE_MASK
--
davide
Powered by blists - more mailing lists