linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL for v6.10-rc6] edac fixes for kernel 6.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:02:23 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	EDAC Mailing List <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...wei.com>,
	Shengwei Luo <luoshengwei@...wei.com>,
	Daniel Ferguson <danielf@...amperecomputing.com>,
	Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
	Jason Tian <jason@...amperecomputing.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL for v6.10-rc6] edac fixes for kernel 6.11

On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 11:33:41AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Borislav,
> 
> Please pull from:
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-edac tags/edac/v6.10-1

Do:

git tag -l <edac tree>

to see how we're naming the EDAC tags and use the same scheme pls.

> For two patches that fix UEFI 2.6+ implementation of the ARM trace event, 
> as the original implementation was incomplete.
> 
> The patches on this series was sent at:
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240321-b4-arm-ras-error-vendor-info-v5-rc3-v5-0-850f9bfb97a8@os.amperecomputing.com/

ac3a74c73a6c (tag: refs/tags/edac/v6.10-1) RAS: Report all ARM processor CPER information to userspace
54481ee6de96 RAS: ACPI: APEI: add conditional compilation to ARM specific error reporting routines.

This is an ACPI patch so it needs Rafael.

Then it needs a Link tag. The ordering we use in the EDAC tree is just like in
tip:

Fixes:
Closes:
Reported-by:
Suggested-by:
SOB chain
Reviewed-by:
Acked-by:
Tested-by:
CC:
Link:

Then, the ifdeffery is ugly but ghes_handle_arm_hw_error() at least puts it
inside the function. log_arm_hw_error() should do the same and then you don't
need the ifdeffery around the prototype.

Patch 1 needs massaging too.

So please send them as a normal set so that I can take a proper look first.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette